The Map Is the Product
The report shows a roof plan with wet areas outlined, core locations numbered and each core's findings recorded. We state the wet area as a share of the roof section so the owner can see whether a cut-and-replace repair is practical. Small, isolated wet areas near a leaking detail are repaired. Wide, connected wet areas point to a failed assembly that a replacement should address.
That share feeds the cost comparison directly. Wet insulation is removed and replaced in either approach, so a survey that gives the quantity lets the bid carry a real number and not an allowance.
The survey ends with a recommendation tied to the findings. If wet insulation is limited, we propose a cut-and-replace repair and a re-scan date. If wet areas are extensive but the deck is sound, we price a tear-off and replacement of the insulation with a new membrane. If the assembly is dry and the membrane is aged, a coating or overlay may fit the capital plan. In each case the proposal lists the quantities of insulation to be replaced, so the cost line follows measurement and not assumption.
Owners who carry the survey into their budget cycle usually find it cheaper than the surprises it prevents.
The proposal then names where each answer came from, so the owner can show a lender, insurer or board why the roof is on the list.